As
I was recently cleaning out some of my bookshelves and drawers to get
ready for the next writing project now that my latest novel has
finally been published, (you can learn more about that by clicking here), I came across a reference sheet handed out to us in our
Freshman year in college typed up by Dr. Michael Murphy who taught
the Romantic Era Music course in the department.
If you are
wondering what my major was, I studied music / musicology at UCC,
Ireland.
Amazing I still had this leaflet after all this years, but
then again, right now I still have all my college notes - never throw
out a useful piece of information is my motto!
The
sheet includes basic but some helpful advice on how to write college
essays – and I couldn't help but have a good laugh over it. The
good Professor had a sense of humour when it came to whipping the
inexperienced writers into shape with his handouts.
It's
worth sharing for its practical information, and, to show what
greenhorns we were when it came to writing on an academic level.
Hey, we were fresh out of high school after all, and in Ireland what
they called an 'essay' in English class is what I would call creative
writing and short story lessons, we hardly received a lesson on how
to produce a real hard-core essay arguing a point, not like I
remember when I was in grade school in the States. (Yeah, my Fifth and Sixth Grade teachers believed in starting early when it came to college preparation!)
However, the English classes in Ireland were different. As
a result, the professors had a mess on their hands when we Freshmen
all arrived. I was certainly rusty even after the 'creative writing
classes'. They must have had a good snicker or two over the first
wonky 'scholarly' scribbles we handed in as 'essays'. Prof. Murphy
kindly gave us the following to sort us out.
Of
course, the old sheet I discovered is geared to music students, but
you can still learn a lot from this if you're new to essay writing,
and, you might get a good chuckle to make your day. Here it is, an
example essay title and how to begin along with Professor Murphy's
comments. (My comments / explanations will be in red if and when
needed):
::::::::::::::
STUDIES
IN REPERTORY MUS 115
ESSSAY
TITLE (with advice)
'Outline
and discuss the main issues of Romantic programme music.'
There
are two tasks involved (i) outline or identify and (ii) discuss the
main (most important, seminal) issues (topics, themes, concepts as
you perceive them) of Romantic programme music. You should identify
the origins of programme music, the main genres which were dedicated
to prog mus, the composers who championed it, the philosophy of prog
mus (e.g. the nineteenth-century idea that instrumental music has the
power to speak and be 'poetic', that music didn't need words to be
complete, that music was more suggestive and expressive and
insightful of the imagination than words could be because words are
too specific whereas music has access to the imaginative world and
can bypass consciousness without hindrance from specific categories.)
There is also the issue of prog mus, symphonic poem and
nationalism. Throughout your essay you must refer to specific works
which were dealt with in class and with which you have become
familiar from your own study. You may photocopy extracts from works
to illustrate your points or you may refer to specific bar numbers.
If you wish to quote an author or lecturer you must acknowledge the
source in a footnote. (I have given advice on this below). It is
immediately obvious if you copy something directly out of a book
because the prose style suddenly changes (not always for the better)
even if you scrape around for synonyms and alternate words and
alternate grammar structures. There is nothing wrong with quoting
other people. In fact you are supposed to do it, but you should (i)
acknowledge your source and (ii) make an intelligent comment about
the quote (e.g. state why you are quoting this author (because you
can't think of anything of your own to write is not a good reason),
do you agree with his / her point, do you wish to modify it,
contradict it, do you think it clarifies some issues etc). Your
first point of reference should be the Grove Dictionary of Music
and Musicians. There are two copies of it in the library (if you
don't know where it is- I mean the dictionary of course) then ask a
librarian or another music student. You should consult the article
on Romanticism, Programme music, Symphonic poem / tone poem, and the
article on relevant composers, and genres.
Please
don't start your essay with a long definition from the Grove of what
prog mus means. I know what the Grove and most other books have to
say about the issue, I am more interested in what you have to say.
Also don't write biographies of the composers. You should set out
your main points in the first introductory paragraph.
Some
points about writing an essay.
Refrain
from using conversational idioms and informal phrases. Such as ' Ya
know the way that Chopin begins the Ballade is a sort of like an
introductory bit.' Don't ask questions in the essay for example,
'Why does Liszt give titles for his symphonic poems?'. Don't write
long meandering sentences which never get anywhere, and which,
through the inclusion of many, and sometimes superfluous clauses,
tend to elongate the sentence to monstrous proportions which have
the effect (and an undesired one at that) of boring the reader to
distraction. Keep the sentences short and to the point. Don't use
abbreviations when writing long words. You may type your essay. Use
a dictionary (or spell checker) to clarify any spelling you are not
sure of. All of these instructions are designed to get you writing
in a professional manner. To be a good writer you have to be a good
reader which means reading with a dictionary and with a critical
attitude. Just because something is written in a book doesn't mean
it is true. It could be an opinion, and opinions can be wrong or
misinformed. You are in a university to form your own informed
opinions. There is little merit in stating something without being
able to support it with evidence and thought.
CORRECT
INCORRECT (even if I do it in handouts)
do
not don't
cannot
can't
does
not doesn't
separate
seperate
programme
music prog mus
Please
note the difference between nineteenth-century and nineteenth
century. The first one is as follows: 'Chopin is a
nineteenth-century composer, and the Ballade is a
nineteenth century
programmatic genre.' In this case nineteenth-century is descriptive
as an adjective. The other one is simply 'In the nineteenth century
blah blah blah'.
PLEASE
TAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOWING SPELLINGS.
Rythmn,
genre, dialogue, legato, dissonant, virtuoso, interrupt, domineering,
definite, equal, arabesque, metre, centre, programme (not 'program'
which is the American style. Use the Anglo version of words.)
competent. Not the difference between 'to compliment' and 'to
complement' – I'm not going to tell you. Consult a dictionary.
(Note:
Since the classes were very small, about 20 to 30 Freshman students
if I recall, I think the rat-a-tat-tat about American spelling was
added for my benefit. In Ireland the Anglo spelling of words is
used. Hence, they did a good job of knocking the American spelling
out of me! So, if you wonder about the British style is in
my works with switched 'r' and 'e's, extra 'u's, not to mention 's'
instead of 'z', things like that, now you know. Also, as a music
student we have to understand musical terms and titles in other other
languages, which explains the next part. German terms and titles can
be confusing!)
ALSO
NOTE THE FOLLOWING GERMAN WORDS
'lied'
= German song
'lieder'
= plural of 'lied'
Ein
Heldenleben
Dichterliebe
('liebe' means love)
Liederkreis
THERE
ARE SOME THINGS YOU SHOULD NEVER DO IN WRITING AN ESSAY. THE
FOLLOWING EXAMPLES ARE TAKEN FROM YOUR LISTENING TEST ANSWERS.
(In 'listening exams', we had to recognise a piece played over the
sound system, the composer, and if we didn't know the piece, that is
if it was a surprise sound clip or we couldn't remember the piece, we
had to explain who we thought it was and why, explain the style etc.
Our listening test answers were also just as wonky!)
IF
YOU SEE ONE OF YOUR MISTAKES IN THE LIST BELOW DON'T PANIC. I DIDN'T
TAKE ANY MARKS OFF FOR THEM AND I WON'T REVEAL YOUR IDENTITY TO ANYONE
UNLESS THE PRICE IS RIGHT. (Yes, the Professor typed that!)
Don't
use words you don't fully understand, and don't use words in the
wrong context e.g. 'befuddling' is not an apt choice in reference to
piano technique.
Don't
write 'Chopin wrote a lot of piano music in his day.'
Don't
write 'This music is difficult to play live.'
Please
don't write 'Strauss takes the mickey out of his critics in Ein
Heldenleben.' Try to be more professional 'Strauss satirises his
critics' would be more appropriate.
Don't
write 'This music is definitely danceable to.'
Don't
write 'In this piece there is a question and answer type of thing'.
Some
of you are a bit confused as to which century you are in. Chopin was
very dead in 1935 but he was composing in 1835.
(Chopin is not impressed. Sorry, I couldn't help myself.)
Please
don't repeat the same thing over and over and over and over and over
again and again and again and again and again etc etc etc etc because
it tends to make the reader very very bored and somewhat tired indeed
when he / she realises that the writer has little to say but insists
on saying it many times just to fill out the page with ink. State
your point once and leave it at that. If you want to refer to a
point you made earlier then do it, but don't repeat the same thing ad
nausem.
GUIDELINES
FOR (I) FOOTNOTES (II) BIBLIOGRAPHY
KEEP
THIS PAGE FOR REFERENCE IN FUTURE YEARS
Footnotes:
The
function of footnotes is to allow you to give the source of a book
from which you quoted something in your main text. You can also use
a footnote to add some opinion of your own to a statement in the text
or to give some extra information which would interrupt the flow of
your text (see example x, number 3 below).
Footnote
can be located in two place (i) at the bottom of the page (ii) at the
end of the essay. The choice is yours. Footnotes must be numbered
(i.e. not with letters). There is a format as to how you present the
information in the footnote. See example x
example
x
1
Carl Dalhaus, Esthetics of Music, tr. William Austin,
Cambridge University Press, Sydney, 1982, p. 122. (Henceforth
Esthetics)
2
Ibid., p. 123.
3
Schumann also wrote songs to poetry by Heine.
4
Esthetics. p. 124.
In
this example note the following:
(I)
After the footnote number you give the Author's name <Carl
Dahlhaus,>
- After the comma you give the name of the book which should be underlined in Italics <Esthetics of Music,> (if a word is underlined it means it is in italics. If you are using a word processor you should give book titles in italics).(III) if the book is translated into English you give the translator's name (in this case <tr. William Austin,> if the book is not translated then ignore this section
- then you give the publisher <Cambridge University Press>
- Then you give the place of publication <Sydney>. Sometimes there are a few places given: give the first one mentioned.
- Then give the year of the most recent edition / publication (sometimes it give the date of earlier editions)
- Then you give the page number from which you have quoted.
In
example x I have written in brackets (Henceforth Esthetics).
This simply means that if I refer to this book again I don't have to
write out al the details as before but I can just write the word
Esthetics and then the page number, e.g. Esthetics, p.
124 as I have shown in number 4. However, if I refer to the same
book twice in a row you can just write Ibid., followed by the page
number as I have shown in number 2. Ibid. simply means 'same as the
previous title'.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The
layout of the bib is a tad different from the footnote layout. The
bib comes at the very end of the essay and is arrange in alphabetical
order. The examples below start at letter S. Please read through
them very carefully. I chose these examples because they show you
how to deal with a number of situations which arise when making out a
bib.
Samson,
J., The Music of Szymanowski, Kahn & Avril, London and New
York, 1980.
Samson,
J., (ed.), Chopin Studies, CUP, 1988.
Samson,
J., (ed.) The Late Romantic Era: Man & Music vol. 7,
Macmillan Press, London, 1991.
Samson,
J., Chopin: The Four Ballades, CUP, 1992
Schoenberg,
A., Structural Functions in Music, ed. Leonard Stein, London,
1969.
Schoenberg,
A., Style and Idea, ed. Leonard Stein, University of
California Press, 1984.
Stein,
J., Richard Wagner and the Synthesis of the Arts, Wayne State
University Press, 1960.
There
are a number of things you should notice from the above examples.
- Although they are arranged in alphabetical order, in the case where an author is quoted a number of times you arrange the books in chronological order (i.e. by year, see the Samson and Schoenberg examples)
- CUP is an abbreviation for Cambridge University Press and OUP is an abbreviation Oxford University Press. Only use such abbreviations when you quote the same publisher numerous times.
- There are finicky things like getting the commas in the right place. For example Arnold Schoenberg is given with the surname first and then the initial of the christian name followed by a full stop and then a comma.
- Above you see Samson as an author and as an editor, hence you have (ed.) after his name to show he edited the book which is a collection of essays by different authors.
:::::::::::::::
This
is where the Professor's handout ends. Of course, if you are
currently in college and your professors have a different layout they
would prefer you to use in your essays, do follow that. If you
haven't been given a guide, well, now you have!
If
you're curious about how my own essays progressed check out my book
“A Compendium of Essays: Purcell, Hogarth and Handel, Beethoven, Liszt, Debussy, and Andrew Lloyd Webber”, click here.
For
fun, see if you can guess which one of the essays WASN'T written
while I was still in college.
Also,
if you want some more in-depth help when writing for the University,
or even creative writing / fiction, etc, this is an excellent book,
click on the title to read my review:
NOTICE: Spammers leaving comments to sell 'essay writing services' for college students, etc. will be DELETED! This blog post is to help promote writing skills - not how to cheat your way through college. Get some integrity.
ReplyDeleteOKAY- you were warned.
ReplyDeleteDue to a number of spammers selling 'essay writing services' in the comments, (aka "pay us and we'll write your college essays for you"), I have now turned off commenting for this blog post.
Students, please develop your writing skills and WRITE YOUR OWN ESSAYS!
An excellent source is the "Oxford Guide to Writing" which I have reviewed here:
https://eabucchianeri.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-oxford-guide-to-writing-rhetoric.html
Again, I'm sorry to have to turn off comments here, you can thank spammers for that.