tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6094790496676897078.post2112954537628971567..comments2023-11-10T09:12:29.419+00:00Comments on Books, Babble and Blarney: President Reagan and the Message of FatimaEA Bucchianerihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03685067504150348329noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6094790496676897078.post-11868863577814274262019-10-20T02:41:56.754+01:002019-10-20T02:41:56.754+01:00Thank you, Elizabeth, for your continuing contribu...Thank you, Elizabeth, for your continuing contributions of Catholic prophetic and other traditional, Catholic-cultural information! It is with dismay, however, that I do not see more comments here, especially affirmative ones, but which lack in itself is a "sign of the times" when people will not discipline themselves to read anything longer than a cell-phone "text" message, let alone write anything at length containing anything worthwhile, let alone study God's Word at length and necessarily balance the Word with the Sacraments.<br /><br />And so, what a negatively ominous factor that people are remaining ignorant of God and His Word and subtly - at least right now - being spiritually "destroyed" (Hosea 4:6, due to clerical negligence, Malachi 2:1-10) and making themselves ready for even more extreme subjection to being computerized by allowing virtually everything about themselves - banking/medical/business etc. - to be "gathered", herded and virtually imprisoned in their CELL phones: Moderation might allow some of this, and when I begin to market my own curriculum of faith and conscience formative books I will probably use a cell phone ... well, maybe. (Actually I have one but cancelled the service months ago.)<br /><br />But those claiming to be disciples of Jesus need to understand that they DO NOT need a cell phone in order to "thrive": We need to know that term is only truthfully relevant and possible for both here AND hereafter-purposes of serving God and the eternally common good of all in accord with the discipline of studying and living by Jesus Christ's (our King's) teaching commands.<br /><br />Many sites on the internet are pushing the impression that we "thrive" via accessing and "enjoying" more and more types, means and sources of pleasure, and so which "means" require money and so which "nurture" an increasing "love" for money (or whatever means one can get to either "thrive" or just remain alive) instead of increasing our choices to subject money and all creature-things to the Vision of God's Word, Will, Truth and Law of Love, i.e. making "mammon" serve God, i.e. our not serving mammon.<br /><br />Anyway, Elizabeth, your types of comments, research and information compilations are a means by which to become focused on what is important and relevant to our eternal souls. May God continue to bless, protect and inspire you! Kevin Landryhttp://evangelart.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6094790496676897078.post-55811985411703991952017-05-22T20:28:25.809+01:002017-05-22T20:28:25.809+01:00Sorry. But I agree with the other two comments. Be...Sorry. But I agree with the other two comments. Because the consecration was not done as Our Lord and Our Lady specified, and there was the Chief Exorcist of Rome who was present only yards from where the Pope was and no mention of Russia was made. The so-called fruits were conditional because the consecration was not fully carried out. I am not calling Sister Lucia a liar, but the Vatican had heavily censored all her pronouncements and all whom she met. Have you seen the two Lucys mentioned at traditioninaction.com? Do you truly believe that the full 3rd secret was given by the Vatican in 2001? Cause right thinking people don't. It doesn't add up. If Vatican 2 was the problem as foretold by MJJ then that same cabal are in control of the Church and could very well be in control of the Fatima message. I think that your work is very thought provoking nevertheless.Paul Dalenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6094790496676897078.post-64601311065341950362016-07-05T09:57:58.182+01:002016-07-05T09:57:58.182+01:00For those who believe that the consecration never ...For those who believe that the consecration never took place is calling Sr. LUCIA HERSELF A LIAR. She revealed that yes, the first 2 consecrecations were not valid as all the bishops did not participate in the consecration, but that the THIRD CONSECRATION with Pope John Paul II WAS ACCEPTED, eventhough many of the bishops did participate because the Pope did contact them all and had every intention of fulfilling every condition, but that it was the bishops who were disobedient. The Consecraction was accepted conditionally. The Pope consecrated Russia AND the world. I have also heard this information from someone who knew Sr. Lucia personally and who received a letter from her stating the same. If you had read the blog post, you would understand why the Reign of Peace has not come to us yet despite the Consecration taking place.EA Bucchianerihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03685067504150348329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6094790496676897078.post-26150766489056252422016-07-04T20:49:18.208+01:002016-07-04T20:49:18.208+01:00Agrreed, p.wilsonAgrreed, p.wilsonPère Walter Covenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06788744058368032371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6094790496676897078.post-67153097974067558132016-07-04T20:06:26.480+01:002016-07-04T20:06:26.480+01:00sadly, St Pope JPII was NOT able to consecrate Rus...sadly, St Pope JPII was NOT able to consecrate Russia (but only the world) in union w/ all the bishops. Had this been done, AS REQUESTED, our Lady's promises would have been fulfilled.p.wilsonnoreply@blogger.com